<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The old invisible text trick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spamhuntress.com/2005/08/21/the-old-invisible-text-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/08/21/the-old-invisible-text-trick/</link>
	<description>writes on spam and admin issues</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: -S-</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/08/21/the-old-invisible-text-trick/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>-S-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2005/08/21/the-old-invisible-text-trick/#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>From that board (Jani), scroll down to the bottom of this page...

http://www.twins-bg.com/clients_en.htm

Sorta evidences a certain prejudice I was earlier suggesting as to who and what sites get the "hammering" and whose and which do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From that board (Jani), scroll down to the bottom of this page&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twins-bg.com/clients_en.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.twins-bg.com/clients_en.htm</a></p>
<p>Sorta evidences a certain prejudice I was earlier suggesting as to who and what sites get the &#8220;hammering&#8221; and whose and which do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/08/21/the-old-invisible-text-trick/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2005/08/21/the-old-invisible-text-trick/#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>I guess the modern ways of getting themselves blacklisted in Google weren't working fast enough so they went back to the early stupid techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the modern ways of getting themselves blacklisted in Google weren&#8217;t working fast enough so they went back to the early stupid techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
