<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: URL within URL</title>
	<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Spam Huntress  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Our resident spammer</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-2378</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-2378</guid>
					<description>[...]  I better post this now instead of waiting until tomorrow) 	So, who did the tigerspice and emistry spam? 	As far as I can tell from the circumstantial evidence, it&#8217;s none other th [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  I better post this now instead of waiting until tomorrow) 	So, who did the tigerspice and emistry spam? 	As far as I can tell from the circumstantial evidence, it&#8217;s none other th [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spam Huntress  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Emistry aka Tigerspice</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-2374</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-2374</guid>
					<description>[...] spice 	 			 					I&#8217;ve uncovered circumstantial evidence that leads me to believe the emistry.com spam came from the same outfit that shot to fame as the tigerspice.com spammer. 	T [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] spice 	 			 					I&#8217;ve uncovered circumstantial evidence that leads me to believe the emistry.com spam came from the same outfit that shot to fame as the tigerspice.com spammer. 	T [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spam Huntress  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Splogs run amok</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1593</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1593</guid>
					<description>[...]  to suspect foul. In fact, those links on that blog (dare I say splog?) reminds me of that URL within URL experiment I covered a while ago. And if you go further back into the past post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  to suspect foul. In fact, those links on that blog (dare I say splog?) reminds me of that URL within URL experiment I covered a while ago. And if you go further back into the past post [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gibb34</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1322</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1322</guid>
					<description>Arg, I keep getting them too. Casinos, syllable.org, Texas Hold Em, bs like that. annoying as crap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arg, I keep getting them too. Casinos, syllable.org, Texas Hold Em, bs like that. annoying as crap
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: code</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1315</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1315</guid>
					<description>yep... I get lots of unwanted comments on my blog, but it's like Stephen said; WordPress puts everything in the moderation que.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep&#8230; I get lots of unwanted comments on my blog, but it&#8217;s like Stephen said; WordPress puts everything in the moderation que.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1304</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1304</guid>
					<description>These bastards have been trying to comment-spam my blog site with this technique for the last 3 days. Fortunately, Wordpress's built-in spam-detector has caught every single one of their spam comments and placed them in a moderation queue for me to check before they are published (or in this case, deleted).
These shitheads piss me off, they're worse than the HTTP-referer spam whores I had a few months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These bastards have been trying to comment-spam my blog site with this technique for the last 3 days. Fortunately, Wordpress&#8217;s built-in spam-detector has caught every single one of their spam comments and placed them in a moderation queue for me to check before they are published (or in this case, deleted).<br />
These shitheads piss me off, they&#8217;re worse than the HTTP-referer spam whores I had a few months ago.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spam Huntress  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Grab bag</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1239</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1239</guid>
					<description>[...] under another spammer&#8217;s nose&#8230; 	Boakes - MyNiceMailAt.com 	I notified Syllable (see this story), and they&#8217;ve posted their outrage on their front page: 	Syllable joe job [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] under another spammer&#8217;s nose&#8230; 	Boakes - MyNiceMailAt.com 	I notified Syllable (see this story), and they&#8217;ve posted their outrage on their front page: 	Syllable joe job [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Search Engines Web</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1235</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/16/url-within-url/#comment-1235</guid>
					<description>Googlebot et al will read the URLâ€™s within URLâ€™s as backlinks? And also gaming people to think respectable sites spammed them?

______________________________________

Actually, that strategy may Now, get them an email - to webmaster@...com or whatever email is on the site

It appears - verified by Matt Cutts - that a pilot project has just been lauched that will detect REDIRECTS or Link Policies  that violate Google's Quality Standards...

It will thenl trigger a generic email - indicating that the site is banned - and what methods have to be done for reinclusion...

Several postings have been made on SEO forums from Webmasters receiving that email...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googlebot et al will read the URLâ€™s within URLâ€™s as backlinks? And also gaming people to think respectable sites spammed them?</p>
<p>______________________________________</p>
<p>Actually, that strategy may Now, get them an email - to <a href="mailto:webmaster@&#8230;com">webmaster@&#8230;com</a> or whatever email is on the site</p>
<p>It appears - verified by Matt Cutts - that a pilot project has just been lauched that will detect REDIRECTS or Link Policies  that violate Google&#8217;s Quality Standards&#8230;</p>
<p>It will thenl trigger a generic email - indicating that the site is banned - and what methods have to be done for reinclusion&#8230;</p>
<p>Several postings have been made on SEO forums from Webmasters receiving that email&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
