<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grab bag</title>
	<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Pollitt</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1318</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1318</guid>
					<description>Not sure it was because of Splog Reporter but the splog I reported has gone...more WordPress splogs have replaced it though. Details in my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure it was because of Splog Reporter but the splog I reported has gone&#8230;more WordPress splogs have replaced it though. Details in my blog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Pollitt</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1310</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1310</guid>
					<description>Many more posts added since I last looked so I'm seeing how effective &lt;a href="http://splogreporter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Splog Reporter&lt;/a&gt; is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many more posts added since I last looked so I&#8217;m seeing how effective <a href="http://splogreporter.com" rel="nofollow">Splog Reporter</a> is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Pollitt</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1303</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1303</guid>
					<description>And another 44 posts so far today. This is a serious splogger. I'm now looking for other WordPress-powered splogs.  Found a couple easily using Google: www digitalcameras wholesalezz com/wp/ (a big one with over 4,500 posts) and www expireddomainbot com/blog 

I'm going to keep monitoring for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another 44 posts so far today. This is a serious splogger. I&#8217;m now looking for other WordPress-powered splogs.  Found a couple easily using Google: www digitalcameras wholesalezz com/wp/ (a big one with over 4,500 posts) and www expireddomainbot com/blog </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to keep monitoring for now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1301</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1301</guid>
					<description>OMG, that's pretty bad!

Any chance of getting it pulled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, that&#8217;s pretty bad!</p>
<p>Any chance of getting it pulled?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Pollitt</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1300</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1300</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the mention, Ann Elisabeth. I'm currently monitoring the splog I mentioned &lt;a href="http://michaelpollitt.com/wordpress/?p=63" rel="nofollow"&gt;in my post&lt;/a&gt; using Bloglines. 200 posts from Friday to Sunday evening inclusive with each post having a link to a spamvertised site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention, Ann Elisabeth. I&#8217;m currently monitoring the splog I mentioned <a href="http://michaelpollitt.com/wordpress/?p=63" rel="nofollow">in my post</a> using Bloglines. 200 posts from Friday to Sunday evening inclusive with each post having a link to a spamvertised site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1247</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1247</guid>
					<description>Oops, I assumed WP would translate my JavaScript into text rather than removing it.  Trying again:

&#60;script type="text/javascript"&#62;&#60;!--
if (self != top) top.location.href = document.location.href;
// --&#62;&#60;/script&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I assumed WP would translate my JavaScript into text rather than removing it.  Trying again:</p>
<p>&lt;script type=&#8221;text/javascript&#8221;&gt;&lt;!&#8211;<br />
if (self != top) top.location.href = document.location.href;<br />
// &#8211;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1246</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1246</guid>
					<description>If your site gets framed (as in what happened to Cary) there is an easy JavaScript solution:



That way if your page is loaded inside anyone's frame it will reload your page without the frames.  It is not a perfect solution and doesn't get rid of the problem, but it might annoy the spammer enough he will quit framing your page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your site gets framed (as in what happened to Cary) there is an easy JavaScript solution:</p>
<p>That way if your page is loaded inside anyone&#8217;s frame it will reload your page without the frames.  It is not a perfect solution and doesn&#8217;t get rid of the problem, but it might annoy the spammer enough he will quit framing your page.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1245</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1245</guid>
					<description>Basically, you'll find what looks like a normal referrer. Then when you check the referrer, you find your content.

That simple. And there might be a frame with varying types of "adornment" around your content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, you&#8217;ll find what looks like a normal referrer. Then when you check the referrer, you find your content.</p>
<p>That simple. And there might be a frame with varying types of &#8220;adornment&#8221; around your content.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Beardsworth</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1244</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1244</guid>
					<description>Hi Ann Elisabeth

Very interested in that comment about framing - can you say a bit more about what to look for in referrer logs?

Keep up the good work

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann Elisabeth</p>
<p>Very interested in that comment about framing - can you say a bit more about what to look for in referrer logs?</p>
<p>Keep up the good work</p>
<p>John
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cary</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1243</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2005/09/17/grab-bag/#comment-1243</guid>
					<description>Hello, and thanks for the write-up. Indeed, it now looks like the scammer site is back, but minus the DB...I'll be keeping an eye on this one for sure.

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, and thanks for the write-up. Indeed, it now looks like the scammer site is back, but minus the DB&#8230;I&#8217;ll be keeping an eye on this one for sure.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
