http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 17 May 2008 03:56:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/#comment-3269 Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:17:15 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/#comment-3269 [...] are put together but are opposed meaning) . Which means he’s the spammer known as Ethical wiki spammers. He seemed to disappear shortly after November, so I tried to fi [...] […] are put together but are opposed meaning) . Which means he’s the spammer known as Ethical wiki spammers. He seemed to disappear shortly after November, so I tried to fi […]

]]> http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/#comment-1929 Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:17:17 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/#comment-1929 Has anyone seen any more evidence of this kind of spam? Has anyone seen any more evidence of this kind of spam?

]]> http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/#comment-1913 Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:43:15 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2005/11/26/ethical-wiki-spammers/#comment-1913 The diffs won't do you much good if the spam survives a legitimate edit. After that, the spam is basically burried until someone notices it in the source or does a diff from the spam or an older revision. That is why <a href="http://wiki.chongqed.org/CSSHiddenSpam" rel="nofollow">CSS Hidden Spam</a> is such a big problem. The diffs won’t do you much good if the spam survives a legitimate edit. After that, the spam is basically burried until someone notices it in the source or does a diff from the spam or an older revision. That is why CSS Hidden Spam is such a big problem.

]]>