Comments on: Do not spam list http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/ Just another WordPress weblog Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:32:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Rose http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-51986 Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:04:39 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-51986 John C. A. Bambenek added my name to a do not spam list because I asked him to add my byline back to an article of mine that he published. John C. A. Bambenek added my name to a do not spam list because I asked him to add my byline back to an article of mine that he published.

]]> by: Mailing List Masters » Blog Archive » Spamhuntress Blog Archive Do not spam list http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-30594 Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:19:04 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-30594 [...] Spamhuntress Blog Archive Do not spam listBlack lists (aka do not spam lists in your terminology) was known to involved persons from the early smtp spam days. Far before the whole industry was criminalized by US (that haven t kill it [...] […] Spamhuntress Blog Archive Do not spam listBlack lists (aka do not spam lists in your terminology) was known to involved persons from the early smtp spam days. Far before the whole industry was criminalized by US (that haven t kill it […]

]]> by: relapse http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2622 Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:24:58 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2622 I'd use a separate (spamtrap) address for posting to these lists. I don't really have anti-abuse 'ties' to pursue these spammers, but at least I'd feed my Bayesian database and see if my rules (from SARE and few written by me) would catch them all. I’d use a separate (spamtrap) address for posting to these lists. I don’t really have anti-abuse ‘ties’ to pursue these spammers, but at least I’d feed my Bayesian database and see if my rules (from SARE and few written by me) would catch them all.

]]> by: Administrator http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2593 Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:55:15 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2593 I got just as much spam after I posted my domains (not e-mail addresses, just domains) on one such do not spam list. I haven't taken opt out lists seriously. I just naturally assumed you'd get a boatload of spam if you posted your address to any such list. I got just as much spam after I posted my domains (not e-mail addresses, just domains) on one such do not spam list.

I haven’t taken opt out lists seriously. I just naturally assumed you’d get a boatload of spam if you posted your address to any such list.

]]> by: relapse http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2587 Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:29:51 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2587 If you know of any global remove-lists, you could post links to them. I'd be glad to post my spamtraps in there. If you know of any global remove-lists, you could post links to them. I’d be glad to post my spamtraps in there.

]]> by: Wayne Rogers http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2298 Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:55:04 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2298 Spammers have do not spam lists. These are the people who they dont spam because they complain the most and cause the most grief. Spammers have do not spam lists. These are the people who they dont spam because they complain the most and cause the most grief.

]]> by: Olliver http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2278 Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:24:59 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2278 @Mister Sam King (I assumed the "p" was a typo, so I took the liberty to omit it) I doubt spamming people who do know how to block it has something of a clever strategy, as your spam is almost certainly not reaching the surface, thus no one there to click on or index it. So it's just a waste of resources that could be used anywhere else much more effective. In other, simpler words: you're not quite earning as much money as you could with a different strategy. But I reckon you're just a troll anyway :-) @Ann Elisabeth I think you should honour that Mister Hudchinson was posting under his real name and was halfways at pains to stay ontopic ("spam") with his advertisement break :-). Sometimes slight inaccuracies are unavoidable if you have to go through a huge Technorati listing related to spam and place your message anywhere before the day is done ;-) I once was visited by such a guy, too. He tried to convince me of using one of his antispam scripts he wrote rather than sticking to .htaccess, as this would consume muuuch less resources and would be muuuch faster. Although this was a great amusement at the right time (having had a bad day so far) I decided to shred this message nonetheless, so I could focus on my work again (instead of having continuous bursts of laughter) ;-) Olliver - talkative dept. - @Mister Sam King (I assumed the “p” was a typo, so I took the liberty to omit it)
I doubt spamming people who do know how to block it has something of a clever strategy, as your spam is almost certainly not reaching the surface, thus no one there to click on or index it. So it’s just a waste of resources that could be used anywhere else much more effective. In other, simpler words: you’re not quite earning as much money as you could with a different strategy. But I reckon you’re just a troll anyway :-)

@Ann Elisabeth
I think you should honour that Mister Hudchinson was posting under his real name and was halfways at pains to stay ontopic (”spam”) with his advertisement break :-) . Sometimes slight inaccuracies are unavoidable if you have to go through a huge Technorati listing related to spam and place your message anywhere before the day is done ;-)

I once was visited by such a guy, too. He tried to convince me of using one of his antispam scripts he wrote rather than sticking to .htaccess, as this would consume muuuch less resources and would be muuuch faster. Although this was a great amusement at the right time (having had a bad day so far) I decided to shred this message nonetheless, so I could focus on my work again (instead of having continuous bursts of laughter) ;-)

Olliver
- talkative dept. -

]]> by: professional web designer http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2261 Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:06:56 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2261 lol...spammers have a lists? lol…spammers have a lists?

]]> by: Spam King http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2250 Wed, 04 Jan 2006 18:15:26 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2250 hate to burst your bubble, but any bh or spammers "do not spam list" actually means these are the ones we want to really really spam the hardest! hate to burst your bubble, but any bh or spammers “do not spam list” actually means these are the ones we want to really really spam the hardest!

]]> by: flambore http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2241 Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:11:18 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/01/02/do-not-spam-list/#comment-2241 LOL An Anti-Spam Spammer. Nice job moron. LOL An Anti-Spam Spammer. Nice job moron.

]]>