<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spyware Stories</title>
	<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Josh - Antispyware</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/#comment-494083</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/#comment-494083</guid>
					<description>Yeah, there's still a lot to learn about spyware. Unfortunately, the creators of spyware are often ahead of the game since they are basically making up the rules, and the antispyware companies are always playing catch up. Will this trend ever be reversed? Hard to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s still a lot to learn about spyware. Unfortunately, the creators of spyware are often ahead of the game since they are basically making up the rules, and the antispyware companies are always playing catch up. Will this trend ever be reversed? Hard to say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/#comment-4410</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/#comment-4410</guid>
					<description>I now see you linked to the survey at the top of the post.  It is easily overlooked when you see the unlinked URL in the message body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now see you linked to the survey at the top of the post.  It is easily overlooked when you see the unlinked URL in the message body.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/#comment-4409</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/03/11/spyware-stories/#comment-4409</guid>
					<description>When I deal with spyware I don't really pay attention to what it is, I just clean it.  And only if I can't get an anti-spyware program to clean it do I try the uninstall.  The few times there has been an uninstall and I actually tried it, often it didn't work or actually undid the partial removal I was able to do manually or with an anti-spyware program.

I hope they can get some good info about spyware, but I wasn't able to fill out their survey.  I don't get spyware on my own computer and don't pay attention to what I remove for other people.  Plus they require "personally identifiable information," name, email, and phone number.

It would be helpful if you made the survey URL a link.

By the way, I really like Webroot Spy Sweeper.  I have run across a few things that neither Adaware or SpyBot could get rid of and gave Spy Sweaper a try and liked it enough to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I deal with spyware I don&#8217;t really pay attention to what it is, I just clean it.  And only if I can&#8217;t get an anti-spyware program to clean it do I try the uninstall.  The few times there has been an uninstall and I actually tried it, often it didn&#8217;t work or actually undid the partial removal I was able to do manually or with an anti-spyware program.</p>
<p>I hope they can get some good info about spyware, but I wasn&#8217;t able to fill out their survey.  I don&#8217;t get spyware on my own computer and don&#8217;t pay attention to what I remove for other people.  Plus they require &#8220;personally identifiable information,&#8221; name, email, and phone number.</p>
<p>It would be helpful if you made the survey URL a link.</p>
<p>By the way, I really like Webroot Spy Sweeper.  I have run across a few things that neither Adaware or SpyBot could get rid of and gave Spy Sweaper a try and liked it enough to pay for it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
