<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DDOS attack</title>
	<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-24498</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-24498</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the info.  I appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  I appreciate it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: reg</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-24447</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-24447</guid>
					<description>To Tim:
Don't bounce spam, please! Look at this for why:
http://wiki.castlecops.com/What_is_Wrong_With_Bouncing_Spam

Spamhuntress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Tim:<br />
Don&#8217;t bounce spam, please! Look at this for why:<br />
<a href="http://wiki.castlecops.com/What_is_Wrong_With_Bouncing_Spam" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.castlecops.com/What_is_Wrong_With_Bouncing_Spam</a></p>
<p>Spamhuntress
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-24134</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-24134</guid>
					<description>Has anyone looked at mailwasher?  I use it to bounce spam and I'm curious if it's really effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone looked at mailwasher?  I use it to bounce spam and I&#8217;m curious if it&#8217;s really effective.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23546</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23546</guid>
					<description>OK, another option for you would be to mess with the DNS records and send the mail to another server that has the required options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, another option for you would be to mess with the DNS records and send the mail to another server that has the required options.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Old useless friend</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23483</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 22:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23483</guid>
					<description>Oops, my bad!

Guess I'm messing up some terminology again.
You live as long as you learn.

I use Psoft's H-sphere admin panel on my web host, and the option there would be to "Discard all incoming mail" on your "catch all" account.

Enjoy the summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, my bad!</p>
<p>Guess I&#8217;m messing up some terminology again.<br />
You live as long as you learn.</p>
<p>I use Psoft&#8217;s H-sphere admin panel on my web host, and the option there would be to &#8220;Discard all incoming mail&#8221; on your &#8220;catch all&#8221; account.</p>
<p>Enjoy the summer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23467</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23467</guid>
					<description>Umm, Simon,

Blackholing breaks e-mail....

If you've got a webhost with cpanel, using REJECT will do what I'm talking about. It doesn't generate bounces when spammers mail you and are turned away. It also doesn't generate double bounces.

But there are lots of mailservers that lack this functionality, or it isn't default.

Sadly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, Simon,</p>
<p>Blackholing breaks e-mail&#8230;.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got a webhost with cpanel, using REJECT will do what I&#8217;m talking about. It doesn&#8217;t generate bounces when spammers mail you and are turned away. It also doesn&#8217;t generate double bounces.</p>
<p>But there are lots of mailservers that lack this functionality, or it isn&#8217;t default.</p>
<p>Sadly
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Old useless friend</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23464</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23464</guid>
					<description>@ann

I'm mostly collecting stats, for fun, just like you. (But since the fall of BlueFrog the spammers really have taken things to another/next level.)

And I can't wait for the 70 million unsupported Windows 98/Me machines to become zombies in a bot network.

And you are probably right about the big mail providers too.

The blackhole is a good idea for people not collecting stats.

Cant help but to wonder if email will be rendered useless in the near future.

Interseting project: http://www.knujon.com/mission.html

B.T.W: I'm this http://spamhuntress.com/2005/10/01/forged-from-address/ useless old friend.

Enjoy the summer, and take a week of from spam!!! (thats an order soldier)

Regards...
Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ann</p>
<p>I&#8217;m mostly collecting stats, for fun, just like you. (But since the fall of BlueFrog the spammers really have taken things to another/next level.)</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t wait for the 70 million unsupported Windows 98/Me machines to become zombies in a bot network.</p>
<p>And you are probably right about the big mail providers too.</p>
<p>The blackhole is a good idea for people not collecting stats.</p>
<p>Cant help but to wonder if email will be rendered useless in the near future.</p>
<p>Interseting project: <a href="http://www.knujon.com/mission.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.knujon.com/mission.html</a></p>
<p>B.T.W: I&#8217;m this <a href="http://spamhuntress.com/2005/10/01/forged-from-address/" rel="nofollow">http://spamhuntress.com/2005/10/01/forged-from-address/</a> useless old friend.</p>
<p>Enjoy the summer, and take a week of from spam!!! (thats an order soldier)</p>
<p>Regards&#8230;<br />
Simon
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23428</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23428</guid>
					<description>To Old useless friend:
The big webmail providers are so big they won't notice your little avalanche of mail - correct me if I'm wrong!

What you need to do, is to turn off catch all, and reject mail to non-existent users. Not bounce, just reject.

E-mail me if you need help. I'm available for consulting. I can even build a server for you, if you like? You know, we're even in the same country!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Old useless friend:<br />
The big webmail providers are so big they won&#8217;t notice your little avalanche of mail - correct me if I&#8217;m wrong!</p>
<p>What you need to do, is to turn off catch all, and reject mail to non-existent users. Not bounce, just reject.</p>
<p>E-mail me if you need help. I&#8217;m available for consulting. I can even build a server for you, if you like? You know, we&#8217;re even in the same country!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Old useless friend</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23366</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 21:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23366</guid>
					<description>Very off topic here, but my domains have been getting about 300- 1000 spam mails an hour the the last few months. Idea: Forward your honeypot (catch all) account to your gmail, yahoo and hotmail/msn account. Its about time they implement spf. And hopefully some of the "big guys" in the market will get pissed at the spammers? Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very off topic here, but my domains have been getting about 300- 1000 spam mails an hour the the last few months. Idea: Forward your honeypot (catch all) account to your gmail, yahoo and hotmail/msn account. Its about time they implement spf. And hopefully some of the &#8220;big guys&#8221; in the market will get pissed at the spammers? Anyone?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23338</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/04/ddos-attack-2/#comment-23338</guid>
					<description>Thanks Lemat, I'll keep this for later. Right now the situation is under control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lemat, I&#8217;ll keep this for later. Right now the situation is under control.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
