Comments on: Javascript deobfuscation http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:57:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Evan http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/#comment-29407 Fri, 04 Aug 2006 01:12:41 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/#comment-29407 MSN is making some improvements in this area (I bet Google and Yahoo are as well, just not publicly stated). Simply put, they use Internet Explorer inside a sandbox environment and let it execute the on-page javascript code. Deobfuscation becomes moot at that point. If you wanna read more about it, check out the Microsoft Research stuff. Everything's available via their public whitepapers. MSN is making some improvements in this area (I bet Google and Yahoo are as well, just not publicly stated). Simply put, they use Internet Explorer inside a sandbox environment and let it execute the on-page javascript code. Deobfuscation becomes moot at that point.

If you wanna read more about it, check out the Microsoft Research stuff. Everything’s available via their public whitepapers.

]]> by: admin http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/#comment-29228 Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:29:57 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/#comment-29228 Thanks Lucia, it got screwed up when WP decided to parse some stuff that I later took out. I didn't notice that the link got corrupted at the time. Thanks Lucia, it got screwed up when WP decided to parse some stuff that I later took out. I didn’t notice that the link got corrupted at the time.

]]> by: lucia http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/#comment-29215 Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:15:43 +0000 http://spamhuntress.com/2006/07/31/javascript-deobfuscation/#comment-29215 I clicked the link to the whole story and it seems to be bad. I clicked the link to the whole story and it seems to be bad.

]]>