<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Spamhuntress</title>
	<link>http://spamhuntress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Problem with the webserver</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/29/problem-with-the-webserver/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/29/problem-with-the-webserver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/29/problem-with-the-webserver/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi guys.
There&#8217;s a problem with the webserver this site is on. I don&#8217;t know exactly what happened, because they didn&#8217;t tell me. My website is intact, but it looks like they haven&#8217;t put in mod_rewrite yet, which my website relies on to produce pretty URLs.
I don&#8217;t know how long it&#8217;ll be before mod_rewrite gets put [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/29/problem-with-the-webserver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OT: What not to throw away - old hardware</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/15/ot-what-not-to-throw-away-old-hardware/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/15/ot-what-not-to-throw-away-old-hardware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Preachy</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/15/ot-what-not-to-throw-away-old-hardware/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure most of you geeks have been through a number of periods when you should throw away some old stuff to get room for new, right? Old computers, old whatever.
I won&#8217;t even mention the name of a friend who just recently threw out a computer (no, not a PERSONAL computer) the size of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/15/ot-what-not-to-throw-away-old-hardware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>419 spam getting through spam filters</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/13/419-spam-getting-through-spam-filters/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/13/419-spam-getting-through-spam-filters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Mail spam</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/13/419-spam-getting-through-spam-filters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I received yet one more 419 spams. I&#8217;ve noticed for a while that they seem to get through my spam filters. After the post I wrote yesterday about stolen passwords, I opened it and looked at the headers. Sure enough:
SquirrelMail authenticated user millerb1
I think this is one reason they&#8217;re using stolen passwords. In one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/13/419-spam-getting-through-spam-filters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>authenticated user</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/11/authenticated-user/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/11/authenticated-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<category>Mail spam</category>

		<category>Admin issues</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/11/authenticated-user/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve seen countless examples lately of mail sent from legitimate accounts via Squirrelmail. Do a search for &#8220;authenticated user&#8221; on news.admin.net-abuse.sightings and sort by date. You&#8217;ll see it&#8217;s become quite common.
I don&#8217;t know exactly what&#8217;s happening here, but I assume spammers have stolen passwords for legitimate accounts somehow.
I know of one case where the spammer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/03/11/authenticated-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Youtube subscriber profile spam</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/25/youtube-subscriber-profile-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/25/youtube-subscriber-profile-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Social networking spam</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/25/youtube-subscriber-profile-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just noticed a new subscriber on my Youtube profile. So I checked it out, because I didn&#8217;t know the nick. I guess most that don&#8217;t have several hundred subscribers would do that, right?
This chick, that has a very sexy sounding nick, had 4,691 channel views and no videos. She joined February 22. So something&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/25/youtube-subscriber-profile-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OT: We&#8217;re sorry, this video is no longer available</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/03/ot-were-sorry-this-video-is-no-longer-available/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/03/ot-were-sorry-this-video-is-no-longer-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/03/ot-were-sorry-this-video-is-no-longer-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this Youtube problem a few days ago. Videos embedded in a Norwegian online newspaper didn&#8217;t work. Although the preview photo was still there, when I clicked on the video to start it, I got the message:
We&#8217;re sorry, this video is no longer available
But when I clicked on &#8220;menu&#8221;, I got the URL [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/02/03/ot-were-sorry-this-video-is-no-longer-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denial of service suit against Comcast</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/27/denial-of-service-suit-against-comcast/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/27/denial-of-service-suit-against-comcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Mail spam</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/27/denial-of-service-suit-against-comcast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got an e-mail from the guy behind the Litigatin blog, who posted about e360insight&#8217;s lawsuit against Comcast.
One of the key points in the lawsuit is that e360insight believe Comcast is using denial of service against their servers.
As I was reading the blog post I thought, wait a minute! e360insight is initiating those connections, not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/27/denial-of-service-suit-against-comcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OT: Old people&#8217;s homes and internet connections</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/19/ot-old-peoples-homes-and-internet-connections/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/19/ot-old-peoples-homes-and-internet-connections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Preachy</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/19/ot-old-peoples-homes-and-internet-connections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My father and I was talking today about something he&#8217;d found on the internet that somewhat worried him. He&#8217;s getting older, and some day he might wind up in a retirement facility. He was worried about certain sleeping pills causing falls.
And then my mind took a turn: How about my father in a retirement facility, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/19/ot-old-peoples-homes-and-internet-connections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for holes on Myspace</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/13/looking-for-holes-on-myspace/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/13/looking-for-holes-on-myspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Social networking spam</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/13/looking-for-holes-on-myspace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, the spammers haven&#8217;t stopped looking for holes to exploit on myspace. I kept getting e-mails about &#8220;Tom&#8221; wanting to be my friend, but never saw a friend request waiting for me, so I wondered what that was about. I pondered that the name was pretty close to the Tom we all know - the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/13/looking-for-holes-on-myspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m feeling lucky spam</title>
		<link>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/05/im-feeling-lucky-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/05/im-feeling-lucky-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Search engine spam</category>

		<category>Mail spam</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/05/im-feeling-lucky-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a spam tonight that had a URL that led to Google. That piqued my curiosity, so I checked it out and figured out why it worked.
The spam was of the Canadian pharmacy variety. Just the usual stuff. So I tried recreating the URL, pointing to one of my sites.
Their URL was a variant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://spamhuntress.com/2008/01/05/im-feeling-lucky-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
